The Starchild Skull -- Genetic Enigma or Human-Alien Hybrid?

Product Information

In addition to the external occipital protuberance on the outside of the skull, there is an “internal occipital protuberance” on the inside. This functions like a shelf holding some of the weight of the brain. While the Starchild does have this internal shelf, it is much smaller than it would be in a normal human. A Mr. Robinson excavated a burial mound on his property in Brewersville, Indiana in either 1879 or 1891 and found a skeleton said to be nine and a half feet tall. Although Mr. Robinson declared that it had been examined by scientists from Indiana and from New York, the bones were suddenly washed away in a 1937 flood before they could be documented. Though the rear of the Starchild Skull is widely expanded and greatly flattened, this is not the result of deliberate binding or cradleboarding. This was verified in 2004 br Dr Ted Robinson and his team.

A frequent visitor to Santa Rosa Island off California in 1860 often discovered numerous Indian skeletons in caves, many of which had double teeth all around. The FOXP2 gene in normal humans is 2,594 base pairs long and contains no variations. In mammals and other "higher" species, any single flaw in FOXP2, any isolated mutation or variation, can cause a severe negative impact in some of the most important aspects of development and will normally lead to death. Could you please tell me what would account for the extra-ordinary amount of collagen found in the StarChild Skull. The following below was an observation made by the the late Lloyd Pye concerning the difficulty in cutting the Starchild skull versus an ordinary skull.

References & Further Reading

Robinson wrote: "One can only reasonably conclude from these statistical studies that the Starchild skull is distinctly different from human," wrote Robinson. Nevertheless, the medical reports and investigations were not enough to convince mainstream scientists that the Starchild Skull was definitely not human. Instead, they explained away the abnormalities with the claim that “nature can do anything.” At an Indian burial ground excavated in Michigan in 1890, three of the skulls recovered had three holes in the crown, and of these, two had double teeth in front.

Robinson έγραψε: «Μπορείκανείςεύλογανασυμπεράνειαπόαυτέςτιςστατιστικέςμελέτεςότιτοκρανίο Starchild είναισαφώςδιαφορετικόαπότοανθρώπινο».Ωστόσο, οιιατρικέςαναφορέςκαιέρευνεςδενήταναρκετέςγιαναπείσουντουςεπιστήμονεςότιτοκρανίο Starchild δενήτανσίγουραανθρώπινο.Έδωσανμίααόριστηεξήγηση, ότιμετιςανωμαλίες«ηφύσημπορείνακάνειταπάντα». A mound excavated in Ohio in 1891 revealed the skeleton known as "Copper Man", so named because of the copper jewelry and other artifacts buried with him, and said to be "enormous". Strange skull aficionados love Copper Man in part because he was actually written up in the December 17, 1891 edition of the journal Nature, issue 1155. Debunk that! In fact, the Nature article was actually a review of a book about gigantism and acromegaly that referenced the alleged discovery, and was not a peer-reviewed report of the find itself. Normal skull bone feature lacunae are absent from the Starchild Skull bone. Lacunae are tiny holes in the bone that offer new cell delivery. The SEM test from Selee Labs shows that these are present in the interior part of the bone. The absence of this structure on the exterior part of the bone can be explained by the cleaning, polishing and coats of lacquer that were applied to the skull. The liquid lacquer filled in the tiny holes on the surface. We are most grateful to the following people, businesses and organizations who provided or donated their time, equipment, and knowledge to the new investigation of the Starchild Skull:A Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) analysis revealed that spikes in oxygen and carbon, and reduced calcium and phosphorus, made this skull bone much more like the compacted collagen found in human tooth enamel. Utilizing known facts about the Starchild Skull: aged 900 years, found near Delicias, Mexico, and having Native American blood, we were able to form a solid theory of his origins. Around 1100, the Mogollon tribe occupied the area where the Starchild Skull was found. They were going through a transition period, from living in pit houses to pueblo-style homes, from hunter-gatherer to more agrarian, and it is believed their area was migrating north due to the influence of the encroaching Anasazi. The Mogollon performed a death ritual that involved placing a bowl decorated with geometric images and depictions of various gods over the face of the dead and then punching a hole through the center to free their spirit to continue living amongst their people. The dead were then buried beneath their home. The Starchild was found alongside an adult woman’s skeleton in a mine or cave. Joe Taylor had discovered the woman’s skull had been severely damaged. She rested above ground next to the body of the Starchild who was buried underneath a mound of dirt. Neither were given a ceremonial burial. It is possible they were deemed unsuitable to live amongst their people in “spirit form” or were unable to travel north with their tribe because of the child’s handicaps and an unknown reason for the female. Although the Starchild Skull was proven to be human, it should be noted that many indigenous people claim to have origins from “Star People.” Map showing the Mogollon territory. More about the Starchild’s origins can be found here. Repatriation Keeping these two questions at the front of our every move proved to be more difficult as the allegations of “not normal” or “mysterious features” have been confusing at times. Adding to the difficulties, were the claims of expert analysis or comments without a name or title from the said individuals. Many statements and declarations have been very public about the Starchild Skull without a single scientific or vettable source or document. These statements are indeed inconclusive and speculative at best and motivated by agenda at the worse. We sorted through the investigation claims with vigor. As investigators, we do not have the luxury of “what ifs” or “could it be?” We promised and accepted the responsibility to conduct a scientific investigation and this is exactly what we have finished. Is the Starchild alien, hybrid or human? The collective scientific data that has a repeatable test result concludes: the Starchild is human. Origins story – https://thefieldreportscom.wordpress.com/2017/05/02/the-dna-results-are-in-plus-bonus-starchild-skull-origin-story/ The human’s bone looks like alabaster, while the Starchild’s bone is milky due to its extraordinary levels of collagen, which is abundant in animal teeth.

An 1876 report mentioned in the 1978 book A Handbook of Puzzling Artifacts alleges that James Brown was plowing his field in Coffee County, Tennessee when he began turning up numerous skeletons of three foot tall pygmies. It was estimated that 75,000 to 100,000 skeletons were buried in his six acres. Sadly, not a single one of them was preserved or documented. Paranormal researcher Benjamin Radford states that often "anything not immediately explainable or obvious is interpreted as a baffling mystery, often with paranormal connotations. ... Science fiction speculation is fun but should not eclipse the real science and significance of these stories". [9] Starchild θαήτανπράγματικάποιοάγνωστοανθρωποειδές.Ανεξάρτητααπότοπόσοδιαφορετικόμπορείναήταναπότουςανθρώπους, γιαναείναιστηνοικογένειατωνανθρωποειδώντογονίδιο FOXP2 τουθαπρέπειναείναιστηνκλίμακα 1 ή 2, τοπολύ 3, παραλλαγέςζευγώνβάσεωναπόένανκανονικόάνθρωπο.Τοναπεράσειτο 5 ήτο 10 θατοέβαζεσεμιαάλληκατηγορίαειδών.Τοναέχεις 56 σημαίνεινατοβάλειςσεμιαάλλησφαίρα, μιαεντελώςάλληδιάσταση.Είναικάτιεντελώςμοναδικό.Nuclear DNA (from both parents, gives individuals their unique qualities) was recovered from the Starchild Skull for the first time. https://thefieldreportscom.wordpress.com/2016/06/17/how-do-you-make-a-replica-of-a-900-year-old-anomalous-skull/ This DNA was submitted to the US National Institutes of Health BLAST for comparison to all other DNA in their database. Some of the DNA was similar to that of a human while some could not be matched. If these results can be reproduced and verified, it will show that the Skull is a previously undiscovered species. In 1829, in Chesterton, Ohio, a mound was excavated in which was found a jawbone with "more teeth" than modern humans, and which was so large that it could fit over the face of a man known for his large jaw.

Paleo Labs tests mt-DNA Paleo-DNA Labs Report showed that the mother of the Starchild Skull was a Native American Human from haplogroup C1. They concluded that further testing for Y-DNA was possible. Not until 2010 was a further round of ancient DNA testing done with more sophisticated technology, wherein nuclear DNA was recovered for the first time. A sample was sent to the US National Institute of Health and run through their BLAST (Basic Local Alignment Search Tool) process for comparison to all other known DNA held in their database. The result? Some was similar to human DNA; some was not. Then, in 2011, mitochondrial DNA was recovered and, similarly, run through the BLAST process. Again, some was found to be similar to human DNA but large amounts were not. Were these results to be corroborated, it would show that the Starchild Skull belonged to an undiscovered species. Prothero, Donald R.; Callahan, Timothy D. (2017). UFOs, Chemtrails, and Aliens: What Science Says. Indiana University Press. pp.113–. ISBN 978-0253027061. In addition to the external occipital protuberance on the outside of the skull, there is an "internal occipital protuberance” on the inside. This functions like a shelf holding some of the weight of the brain. While the Starchild does have this internal shelf, it is much smaller than it would be in a normal human. The stories are symptomatic of a late 19th century fad. Strange skeletons and petrified people were quite popular in the United States in the 19th century, and it wasn't just limited to skulls with double teeth. It seemed that just about everyone with a circus tent or a traveling show had some enigmatic human remains, which always conveniently managed to be lost or destroyed before they could be properly scrutinized. Mark Twain lampooned these stories on a number of occasions. He once wrote:Skeptic's Answer:It is a child of about 5 years old, and possibly had Progeria, which causes dental problems. While a tiny amount of survivable mutations are possible in FOXP2, every one that occurs presents debilitating or life-threatening consequences, so up to this point in time none have been passed on to the general population of humans. This means in the vast, vast majority of humans, the FOXP2 master gene is absolutely identical.