AMD Ryzen 3 2200G Processor with Radeon Vega 8 Graphics - Wraith Stealth Cooler - YD2200C5FBBOX

Product Information

The difficulty with integrated graphics isn't something that's going to go away in the immediate future, at least not without increasing the cost. The chief problem is the need to share both power and memory bandwidth with the CPU. While it's theoretically possible to have an APU with two or three times the GPU cores as the 2200G (Ryzen 7 2700G with Vega 24, anyone?), graphics processing tends to be extremely bandwidth hungry. Dual-channel DDR4-3200 can manage about 64GB/s, a chunk of which goes to the CPU, whereas even a modest GTX 1050 has about twice that much dedicated bandwidth.

I performed my benchmark testing using PCMag's Ryzen B350-chipset testbed, the same machine we used to test a host of other recent AMD CPUs. It's equipped with a Gigabyte AB350-Gaming 3 motherboard, 16GB of Corsair DDR4 memory, and a Toshiba OCZ Vector 150 boot drive.Ryzen 3 2200G only has 65W of TDP, while this one has 185W and will be easily compatible with the processor. It is also used by many professionals and is highly recommended for its impressive power and performance. With MSI GTX 1650 Sper, gamers and content creators have the best budget option. MSI’s GTX 1650 Super is more powerful and costs slightly more than AMD’s RX 570 4GB. A graphics card like this one can handle all the latest games smoothly when paired with a Ryzen 3 3200G processor. A maximum of 64 GB can be installed in the four RAM slots. Therefore, ECC and non-ECC memories are allowed, although the installed ECC memory will operate in non-ECC mode. The MSI B450 Tomahawk rivals the popular B350 Tomahawk and offers more reliability and a better feature set for users. The MSI B450 comes with a pair of USB 3.1 Gen2 ports and customizable RGB LED lighting on the board.

It also works well with a limited power supply and is future proof too. The GeForce GTX 1050 ti is easy to install and does not consume a lot of power or generate heat. What is the best GPU for Ryzen 3 3200g so far? The card comes with six SATA 6 Gbps, which support bays 0, 1, and 10. One M.2 slot is present with drive support up to M.2 22110 and supports up to PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA devices, but this slot will disable two SATA ports. This includes the combination of cheap and decent quality Realtek drivers on the audio side. One of the most beneficial performance aspects of this model compared to the previous Tomahawk board is the increased memory support.Yes, you can use the GPU with Ryzen 3 2200G. All processors are compatible with certain graphics cards, even if they have some integrated. The Ryzen 3 2200G has an integrated 8-core Radeon RX Vega graphics card to keep the processor running well. To get a sense of how good these in-game benchmark results are, consider that even low-end discrete GPUs like the Nvidia GeForce MX series typically don't offer more than 50fps under similar conditions. Meanwhile, the integrated graphics chip in the Intel Core i3-7350K achieved 31fps on the Tomb Raider Normal test, and just 16fps at the Ultra setting. The card comes with DDR4-3466MHz with a capacity of up to 64GB with four available memory slots. The card ships with a single M.2 slot compatible with PCIe 3.0 x4 and SATA with a maximum of M.2 22110 compatible drives. The multi-core, multi-thread performance story is much the same with 7-Zip, another widely used app, this one for compressing files that takes advantage of as many cores and threads that your processor can offer. The Ryzen 3 2200G achieved a score of 15,810 on the app's built-in benchmark, again outperforming its previous-gen predecessors and the Core i3. At the same time, the highest memory on the graphics card is 24 GB. Play with 4K resolutions. 8 GB of memory is enough for you. Form factor

Also, the Radeon RX 570 is not powerful enough to reach as much VRAM in some games. However, it does not stop giving its highest performance in need. It is also compatible with Intel and offers almost the performance of AMD. Plus, it’s great for up to 60 FPS at 1080p. In non-gaming tasks, there's not much to say that I haven't already said. Performance is equal (and even slightly ahead of) the Ryzen 3 1300X, and a larger jump relative to the Ryzen 3 1200. If you have one of those already with a dedicated graphics card, no problem, but going forward there's very little reason to even think of the CPU-only Ryzen 3 parts. Unless prices drop below that of the 2200G, I suppose. The change from a dual-CCX (CPU Complex) layout with up to eight cores, to a native four-core solution with Vega graphics, is far more sensible in the budget market. Once the Ryzen 3 2200G was up and running, I put it through a series of benchmark tests to gauge its performance on everyday tasks, as well as specialized applications like video rendering and compressing files.

Why is AMD Ryzen 3 2200G better than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G?

In the real world, this means that the Ryzen 3 2200G will serve as a decent low-cost platform for multithreaded apps like Handbrake, an open-source utility for converting videos between formats. Typically, the more threads and cores your processor has, the better Handbrake likes it. Indeed, the Ryzen 3 2200G took just 15:19 to convert a 12-minute 4K video file to 1080p. The Core i3-7350K performed the same task in 22:59, while the previous-gen Ryzen 3 chips both took longer than 16 minutes. Budget gamers will find the Zotac GTX 1660 Twin Fans to be a great choice. Not only is it a great performer, but it is also a great value. On the gaming side of things, the 2200G with high-end RAM is slightly faster than a 2400G with budget RAM. Again, definitely don't go with the cheapest RAM you can find if you're hoping to get the most of the integrated GPU. The 2200G is also more than twice as fast as Intel's latest HD Graphics 630. Neither solution is going to handle the latest games at higher quality settings and 1080p or higher resolutions, but I did some additional 1080p low testing and the 2200G gets above 30fps in the majority of games. Lighter fare is even better, so CS:GO for example easily runs at more than 60fps average (though periodic stutters and dips below 30fps are still present for some reason). I've appeared on CBS News, in USA Today, and at many other outlets to offer analysis on breaking technology news. Meanwhile, the system-on-a-chip had no problems running Overwatch at 30fps despite setting the game with a 4K display resolution and ‘Epic’ quality settings.